Cross-functional AS-IS
Understand activities, decisions, exceptions, systems and data with participating functions instead of relying on informal knowledge.
We make current work visible, remove friction and design future processes with decisions, roles, controls and KPIs ready for implementation.
The service starts with business objectives and operating evidence to separate root causes, necessary work and non-value-added activity.
The TO-BE design defines how decisions, information and responsibilities should flow and how to put the new process into practice.
For: organizations with manual, fragmented or poorly traceable processes in any function, or processes that must support a new strategy or technology.
The redesign connects expected performance with a way of working that teams can understand, measure and govern.
Understand activities, decisions, exceptions, systems and data with participating functions instead of relying on informal knowledge.
Simplify the flow and determine what should be automated once the process, rules and exceptions are clear.
Assign roles, controls and metrics that sustain and improve the process after the project.
Adjust detail and ways of working to the scope, function maturity and decision to be enabled.
The service applies to operational, administrative and support processes—for example, in operations, talent or user support. The method is consistent: understand the current process, design the future and prepare the transition.
Published evidence covers a talent process. Other functions require their own diagnostic; results are not extrapolated.
The level of detail follows the decision and scope. We avoid documentation for its own sake and future designs disconnected from operations.
Define scope, expected outcomes, process customers and success criteria.
Observe flows, decisions, roles, systems, time, controls and exceptions.
Separate symptoms from root causes and assess friction, risk and opportunity.
Simplify the flow and define future roles, rules, data, controls and KPIs.
Prioritize changes, dependencies, owners, pilots and follow-up mechanisms.
We build a shared view of how the process works and what explains its main gaps.
AS-ISWe simplify activities and define the target way of working with explicit operating and performance criteria.
TO-BEWe turn the design into a sequence of initiatives teams can implement, measure and refine.
TransitionAn operating model can activate implementation, adoption or broader transformation initiatives without confusing the process with the tool.
Current flow, activities, decisions, owners, systems, controls and exceptions.
Causes, friction, risks and opportunities prioritized against expected outcomes.
A simplified future process with explicit rules, interfaces and operating criteria.
Responsibilities and decision rights by activity, exception and outcome.
Metrics, definitions and control points to manage and improve the process.
Quick wins, initiatives, dependencies and owners that move the design into operations.
BTC publishes an education and healthcare case that maps flows, designs the future process, aligns practices in a playbook and clarifies roles for automating key tasks.
The case describes greater efficiency in talent acquisition, a more effective onboarding process, and fewer manual tasks, delays and errors.
Evidence scope: the outcomes belong to the published talent process and should not be extrapolated to another function or context without a specific diagnostic.
Review the talent process caseNo. The scope should address a relevant decision or performance gap. Detail is added where it helps remove a cause, control a risk or enable the change.
It can define automation requirements, but first it clarifies the process, rules and exceptions. This prevents teams from digitizing activities that do not add value.
The TO-BE design is accompanied by owners, KPIs, quick wins, dependencies and a transition roadmap that enables teams to pilot and refine the new way of working.
Inputs include the current process map, performance data, rules, exceptions, controls, systems, user needs and the causes behind performance gaps. That evidence informs future activities, decisions, roles, metrics and requirements without carrying current inefficiencies into the new design.
We can start by defining the process, the outcome that must improve and the signals that make execution difficult today.